It’s been interesting to track the uptake of the ACCC’s streamlined procedure for granting exemption to small businesses wanting to engage in collective bargaining with customers and suppliers. As was expected, there was early uptake by newsagents and car dealership franchisees when the exemption procedures commenced on June 3, 2021. Somewhat surprising (or not, depending on your perspective and experience), has been the uptake by healthcare professionals.
Anaesthetists
In one application, the Australian Society of Anaesthetists accessed the exemption procedure on behalf of anaesthetists treating public health system patients in private hospitals in Victoria.
The Society indicated that is wished to negotiate about “processes to ensure the safety of public health system patients treated in private hospitals, industrial conditions and remuneration of anaesthetists participating in such treatment.”
Dentists
In another application, a bargaining group of dentists and dental practices significantly owned by members of the Australian Dental Association accessed the exemption procedure to collectively negotiate with private health insurance companies, their intermediaries, and payment gateway providers about the terms and conditions of provider contracts and policies and “all matters related to the conduct of the target businesses … including rights to contract”.
Observations
The subject matter of the exempted negotiations remains strongly “industrial”, at present. That might not be surprising.
However, locum agencies who have significant numbers of independent contractor locums on their books might start to anticipate that, before too long, independent professional health practitioners, who up until now have not had much access to collective bargaining, may shortly wake up to the fact that the ACCC’s streamlined process now gives them that access if they can organise themselves into bargaining groups.
At some point, recruitment and staffing agencies may also begin to recognise the potential to collectively negotiate on tenders – especially if their bargaining groups are able to harness competitive cost and supply efficiencies that can be available through networked arrangements.
It’s a fascinating development to watch unfold. And, whilst the streamlined class exemption procedure doesn’t compel the target to negotiate with the group, it might often be wiser to find ways of using the procedure constructively than to resist it. Recruitment and staffing firms and procurers of their services should take note.
Andrew C. Wood
In WorkAccord’s Summer series of Tuesday TalkAbouts, we introduced the concept of “waypoints” as those points on a journey where we can pause, take stock, and choose the direction we will follow for the next stage. As the COVID-19 pandemic response has rapidly escalated, it seems that we might have rushed through several of those waypoints and might now be asking, “What comes next?” 
As job-based employment seemingly evolves toward job-based entrepreneurship in the freelance, contracting and gig economies, it’s becoming increasingly important for recruitment, contracting and staffing businesses to keep up to date with competition & consumer law developments that impact their sector and their incorporated workers.
The “factory model” of services production and supply, based on efficiency in repeating similar transactions has been disrupted by Artificial Intelligence. Astute suppliers in the recruitment, contracting & staffing industry are already talking about a major shift from transaction to transformation.
Much of my work, when I am rehabilitating parties’ terms of business, requires me to reflect on the nature and quality of their agreement (and its opposite). We are often taught that agreement is good and that disagreement or conflict is bad. However, adopting an accord-centred approach, it seems possible to reflect a little more deeply.
Recruiters' Casebook 