That’s because we’re finally going to get a chance to attack some of the harder questions, as we discover where cracks are likely to be found – and how to plan for them.
Here’s just a few:
- What does it really mean to “supply a worker”?
- When does a worker work “in and as part of the business or undertaking” of a host?
- Is this a different test from the integration test formulated by the Federal Court in On Call Interpreters and Translators Agency Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (No 3)  FCA 366?
- If not, will it ever be possible to “supply” an independent contractor within the meaning of s. 7 of the Labour Hire Licensing Act 2018 (Vic)?
- Is the on-hire of independent contractors dealt with under some other provision of the Act?
- What happens if the worker is incorporated?
- What is the nature of the s.9 “obligation” to pay a worker for the performance of the work?
- Does anyone have such an “obligation” if the individual receives payment on some other basis – e.g. a directors fees for working in their own company, or as the beneficiary of a discretionary trust with an incorporated trustee?
- How does all this play out in labour contracting chains and service networks?
These aren’t the sort of questions that can be addressed in a brief overview. They’re questions that need to be asked, notwithstanding comments about “clever lawyers” (as though that’s a bad thing) that I heard made when I attended the public briefings.
So, that’s why we’re having a masterclass.
And that’s why I’m excited.
I hope to see you there!
Andrew C. Wood